Why did the removal of an incompetent and corrupt 2nd prince cause a succession struggle when there was already a Crown Prince whose position was only strengthened by the situation?
Think about it like this, it is easier to control a fool than a wise man. People would want the second prince to use as a puppet beside the 2nd prince probably wasn’t stealing alone. People will always be divided over who takes the thrown even if there’s a crown prince.
2 Comments
Join the discussion
Sign in to comment, reply, vote, and report content that breaks the rules.
Keep the discussion welcoming, relevant, and spoiler-aware. Read the comment rules
Why did the removal of an incompetent and corrupt 2nd prince cause a succession struggle when there was already a Crown Prince whose position was only strengthened by the situation?
Think about it like this, it is easier to control a fool than a wise man. People would want the second prince to use as a puppet beside the 2nd prince probably wasn’t stealing alone. People will always be divided over who takes the thrown even if there’s a crown prince.
Like father like daughter